Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAltingoz, Sema Merve
dc.contributor.authorKurgan, Sivge
dc.contributor.authorOnder, Canan
dc.contributor.authorSerdar, Muhittin A
dc.contributor.authorUnluturk, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorUyanik, Metin
dc.contributor.authorBaskal, Nilgun
dc.contributor.authorTatakis, Dimitris N
dc.contributor.authorGunhan, Meral
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-15T10:10:17Z
dc.date.available2021-01-15T10:10:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-05
dc.identifier.other33277933
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12591/476
dc.description.abstractBackground: Non-invasive methods for periodontitis diagnosis would be a clinically important tool. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association between oxidative stress, glycation, and inflammation markers and periodontal clinical parameters in periodontitis and periodontally healthy patients with type 2 diabetes and corresponding systemically healthy controls. Material and methods: Sixty-seven periodontally healthy (DM-H, n = 32) and periodontitis (DM-P, n = 35) patients with type 2 diabetes, and 54 systemically healthy periodontitis (H-P, n = 26) and periodontally healthy (H-H, n = 28) controls were included. Clinical periodontal parameters, body mass index, fasting glucose, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), along with saliva and serum 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), malondialdehyde (MDA), 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), advanced glycation end products (AGE), AGE receptor (RAGE) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels were recorded and analyzed. Results: Salivary 8-OHdG levels were significantly higher in periodontitis compared to periodontally healthy patients, regardless of systemic status (P < 0.001). Salivary MDA levels were significantly higher in all disease groups compared to H-H group (P ≤ 0.004). Serum AGE levels were significantly higher in diabetic groups than systemically healthy groups (P < 0.001) and in H-P compared to H-H (P < 0.001). Bleeding on probing (BOP) and clinical attachment level (CAL) strongly correlated with salivary 8-OHdG and serum hsCRP (P < 0.001). In systemically healthy patients, salivary 8-OHdG was the most accurate marker to differentiate periodontitis from controls (AUC = 0.84). In diabetics salivary 4-HNE and RAGE were the most accurate (AUC = 0.85 for both). Conclusion: Salivary 8-OHdG alone or in combination with 4-HNE, AGE and RAGE for diabetics, and salivary 8-OHdG alone or in combination with MDA and hsCRP for systemically healthy persons, could potentially serve as non-invasive screening marker(s) of periodontitis. © 2020 American Academy of Periodontologyen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDiş Hekimliği Fakültesien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subject4-hydroxy-2-nonenalen_US
dc.subject8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosineen_US
dc.subjectdiabetes mellitusen_US
dc.subjectoxidative stressen_US
dc.subjectperiodontitisen_US
dc.subjecttype 2en_US
dc.titleSalivary and serum oxidative stress biomarkers and advanced glycation end products in periodontitis patients with or without diabetes: A cross-sectional study.en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPeriodontolojien_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess